Sanders Unified School Dist 18

Billed Entity 143228 · Arizona

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$78K$179K$78K$78K$78K$31K$57K$123K$138K$119K$143K$213K$198K$206K$178K$644K$642K$684K$126K$44K$134K$540K$696K$1.2M$209K$28K
Average discount rate90%90%88%90%90%90%90%70%50%63%77%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2232333333
Service providers1121111266513169109118635897774
Avg download speed (Mbps)3503503503504404403,6505,3755,375625
Avg upload speed (Mbps)3503503503504405403,6505,3755,375625

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$8K$20K$35K$52K
Telecomm Services$67K$68K$64K$65K$66K$70K$80K$50K$41K$44K$72K$80K$62K$26K$5K
Internal Connections$101K$459K$434K$520K$62K$460K$634K$1.2M$148K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K$31K$49K$103K$103K$67K$75K$145K$106K$82K$67K$62K$86K$114K$35K$23K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$28K$59K$45K$54K$42K$85K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
NTUA Wireless, LLC$78K$78K$78K

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Sanders Elementary SchoolHwy 191 South & I-40 86512Sanders85%287287100%500500Rural
Sanders Middle SchoolApache 7160 86512Sanders90%178178100%1,0001,000Rural
Valley High SchoolHwy 191 South & I-40 86512Sanders90%196196100%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.