Hopi Jr/Sr High School District

Billed Entity 98627 · Arizona

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$62K$113K$143K—$186K$173K$131K$133K$141K$150K$163K$136K$100K$915K———————————$198K——
Average discount rate90%90%90%90%87%88%90%36%49%68%77%90%90%90%———————90%—80%—90%——
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111——————————————————
Service providers22112215534566———————6—3—2——
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,00010,00040040040050090909090——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,00010,00040040040050090909090——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice———————$3K$8K$12K$13K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$44K$43K$37K——————————————
Internal Connections————$41K$26K———————$850K———————————$198K——
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$62K$113K$143K—$146K$146K$131K$131K$131K$131K$131K$92K$57K$28K——————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections—————$2K——$2K$7K$19K—————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————
Wireless School Bus Services and Equipment————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Commnet AZ, LLC$62K$107K——————————————————————————
Kajeet, Inc.—$6K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Hopi Jr/Sr High SchoolPo Box 337 86034Keams Canyon90%47046198%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.