Christian Brothers High School

Billed Entity 111743 · California — Northern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$47K$3K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$9K$14K$13K$13K$12K$11K———————————$14K—
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%30%40%40%40%40%——————————40%40%—
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111——————————————————
Service providers221111111244545——————————23—
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000200——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000200——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice——————————$4K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$10K$11K$10K$9K———————————$1K—
Internal Connections$44K—————————————————————————$13K—
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$3K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$9K$11K$4K$2K$2K$2K—————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Consolidated Communications Enterprise Services, Inc.$3K$3K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$9K——————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Christian Brothers High School4315 M L King Jr Blvd 95820Sacramento40%1,14811410%1,0001,000Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.