Roseville Jt Un High Sch Dist

Billed Entity 144568 · California — Northern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$122K$210K$447K$299K$474K$558K$263K$437K$96K$256K$60K$144K$90K$108K$116K$122K$94K$122K$114K$97K$94K$79K$14K
Average discount rate60%60%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%43%38%53%48%48%48%48%49%43%40%35%35%35%37%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222221111
Service providers32333324364455566556542
Avg download speed (Mbps)10,00010,00010,0007,0007,0007,0003,5002,5007,000
Avg upload speed (Mbps)10,00010,00010,0007,0007,0007,0003,5002,5007,000

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$9K$17K
Telecomm Services$37K$137K$85K$103K$110K$116K$91K$111K$103K$89K$88K$71K$14K
Internal Connections$68K$23K$293K$138K$314K$389K$115K$317K$151K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$54K$187K$155K$160K$160K$158K$148K$121K$96K$96K$6K$7K$5K$5K$5K$6K$3K$10K$10K$8K$6K$8K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$11K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Consolidated Communications Enterprise Services, Inc.$5K$187K$155K$160K$160K$158K$148K$33K$21K$22K$1K
AMS.NET, Inc.$23K

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Antelope High School7801 Titan Dr 95843Antelope60%1,7811,16665%10,00010,000Urban
Roseville Adult School200 Branstetter St 95678Roseville60%98000%10,00010,000Urban
West Park High2401 Panther Place 95747Roseville60%2,38780534%10,00010,000Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.