San Diego Center For Children

Billed Entity 16025053 · California — Southern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$7K$32K$21K$20K$16K$16K$12K$16K$19K$30K$24K$25K$47K$60K$135K$38K$31K$21K$35K$73K$19K———————
Average discount rate90%88%90%80%80%80%80%80%50%67%70%80%80%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%———————
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111——————————————————
Service providers121111111213536223474———————
Avg download speed (Mbps)500500500500100100100100100100——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)500500500500100100100100100100——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$3K$5K$8K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$10K$25K$23K$15K$16K$17K$13K$28K$31K$14K———————
Internal Connections—$12K———————$8K————$60K————$23K————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$7K$21K$21K$20K$16K$16K$12K$16K$16K$16K$16K$15K$22K$25K$47K$9K$8K$4K$7K$7K$2K———————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections—————————————$13K$13K$13K$6K$4K—$12K$3K———————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cox California Telcom, LLC$7K$21K$21K$20K$16K$16K$12K$16K$19K$22K$24K$25K———$25K$25K$17K——————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
San Diego Center For Children3002 Armstrong St 92111San Diego90%5656100%500500Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.