Hanover School District 28

Billed Entity 142320 · Colorado

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$8K$8K$18K$10K$10K$10K$7K$24K$43K$32K$35K$36K$45K—$55K$31K$17K—$7K$13K———————
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%50%66%77%85%85%83%—86%85%82%45%80%80%70%————40%—
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers11121111666666—7756452————1—
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,00010010051——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,00010010051——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$3K$8K$11K—————————————————
Telecomm Services——————————$14K$15K$14K$11K—$15K$15K$4K—$2K$4K———————
Internal Connections————————————————————$4K———————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$8K$8K$8K$10K$10K$10K$7K$13K$21K$8K$21K$22K$34K—$13K$10K$13K—$5K$6K———————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections—————————$14K—————$27K$6K———————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services———$10K————$8K———————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
ENA Services, LLC$6K$8K$8K$8K$10K$10K$10K—————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Hanover Junior-Senior High School17050 South Peyton Hwy 80928Colorado Spring90%13512190%1,0001,000Rural
Prairie Heights Elementary School7930 Indian Village Heights 80817Fountain90%139139100%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.