Rangely School District R E 4

Billed Entity 142466 · Colorado

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$9K$10K$9K$9K$9K$9K$9K——$27K—$26K$7K$16K—$11K$11K$14K$16K———$14K—————
Average discount rate70%65%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%47%50%68%60%60%—57%52%50%52%—52%56%56%——54%—54%
Schools & libraries (in this area)3333333—33——————————————————
Service providers21112111152223—2224—331——1—1
Avg download speed (Mbps)300300300300300300300—400300——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)300300300300300300300—400300——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice—————————$4K——————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$13K—$11K—$11K$11K$11K$13K———$14K—————
Internal Connections—————————$12K——————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$9K$10K$9K$9K$9K$9K$9K——$11K—$13K$7K$5K——$772$3K$3K—————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Rio Blanco County$9K$10K$9K$9K$9K$9K$9K—————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Parkview Elementary School609 S Stanolind Ave 81648Rangely70%24413254%1,0001,000Rural
Rangely High School234 S Jones Ave 81648Rangely70%1456041%1,0001,000Rural
Rangely Middle School550 River Rd 81648Rangely70%1135145%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.