Kaneland Comm Unit S D 302

Billed Entity 135421 · Illinois

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$19K$19K$13K$6K$6K$13K$55K$28K$107K$20K$28K$25K$30K$34K$55K$32K$33K$17K$18K$18K$21K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%42%40%27%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers323111232343334244354
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0005,0001,0001,0002,0002,0002,0006,0002,000
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0001,0001,0001,0002,0002,0002,0006,0002,000

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$11K
Telecomm Services$23K$25K$30K$34K$55K$32K$33K$17K$18K$18K$21K
Internal Connections$19K$7K$39K$12K$87K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$19K$6K$6K$6K$13K$16K$16K$18K$10K$5K$12$15
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$1K
Managed Internal Broadband Services
Wireless School Bus Services and Equipment

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$13K$3K$9K$8K$10K$10K$2K$144$79
Northern Illinois University$6K$6K$6K$6K$13K$16K$16K$18K$10K$5K

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Kaneland Harter Middle School1601 Esker Dr 60554Sugar Grove50%92016218%10,00010,000Rural
Kaneland High School47w326 Keslinger Rd 60151Maple Park50%1,13619217%10,00010,000Urban
Kaneland Middle School1 N 137 Meredith 60151Maple Park50%84315218%10,00010,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.