Martinsville C U Sch Dist 3 C

Billed Entity 136562 · Illinois

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$3K$1K$29K$42K$18K$15K$6K$12K$34K$13K$9K$7K$7K—$3K$3K$7K$3K————$2K—$4K$5K$10K
Average discount rate—80%80%80%80%80%80%80%60%60%75%76%76%76%66%66%66%67%67%—67%67%65%65%55%60%60%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers—112222122222245555—44421111
Avg download speed (Mbps)———1001001001001005050——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)———100100100100100550——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$480$706$1K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$5K$7K$7K—$502$653$4K———————$4K$5K$5K
Internal Connections————$13K$4K——$6K$28K——————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access———$13K$13K$13K$8K$6K$6K$5K$6K$4K———$3K$3K$3K$3K————$2K———$4K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections——————————$6K—————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services—$3K$1K$16K$15K$756$7K—————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Quality Network Solutions, Inc—$3K$1K$16K$28K$5K$7K—$6K$28K$6K—————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Martinsville Elementary School410 E Kendall St 62442Martinsville80%22113059%2,0002,000Rural
Martinsville Sr High School300 W Cumberland 62442Martinsville80%16910361%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.