Anna Comm Cons Sch District 37

Billed Entity 136800 · Illinois

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$12K—$13K$14K$13K$12K$8K$8K$12K$6K$12K$7K$12K—$13K$12K$15K$15K$12K$14K$14K$14K$12K$6K———
Average discount rate—80%—80%80%80%80%80%56%64%73%76%73%71%78%77%80%76%73%75%75%73%73%73%73%———
Schools & libraries (in this area)3322222222——————————————————
Service providers—3—1121133423334333333334———
Avg download speed (Mbps)———30010010075353535——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)———30010010075353535——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$572$4K$2K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$7K$7K$10K—$10K$8K$15K$15K$7K$14K$14K$14K$12K$6K———
Internal Connections—$5K——————————————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access———$13K$14K$13K$12K$8K$8K$8K$4K$5K—$1K—$3K$3K——$5K————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services—$8K——————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Novacom Inc—$8K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Anna Junior High School301 S Green St 62906Anna80%23917172%1,0001,000Rural
Davie Elementary School301 S Green St 62906Anna80%2147435%——Rural
Lincoln Elementary School108 Warren St 62906Anna80%17516795%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.