Morrisson-Reeves Library

Billed Entity 130620 · Indiana

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$23K$38K$28K$92K$22K$58K$18K$18K$34K$86K$33K$25K$19K$18K$14K$14K————————$1K—$6K—
Average discount rate87%86%88%86%90%87%90%63%75%80%83%90%80%80%80%80%——————80%—70%—70%—
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111——————————————————
Service providers2212121233222211——————2—2—3—
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0002,0002,0001,0001,000100501003040——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0002,0002,0001,0001,000100501003040——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice———————$194$859$2K$2K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$4K$4K$4K——————————$1K—$6K—
Internal Connections—$4K—$70K—$39K———$50K——————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$23K$27K$25K$22K$22K$19K$18K$18K$33K$34K$31K$21K$15K$14K$14K$14K————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$449$449———$359———$757——————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services—$7K$3K—————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
ENA Services, LLC$23K$34K$28K$22K$22K$19K$18K$18K$33K$33K$30K$21K$15K$14K$14K$14K————————————
Electronic Strategies, Inc.$449$4K———$39K——————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Morrisson-Reeves Library80 N 6th St 47374Richmond90%———1,0001,000Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.