Manchester Community Schools

Billed Entity 130897 · Michigan

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$76K—————$71K$10K$1K$11K—$7K$11K$11K$10K$14K$12K$12K$12K$11K$7K$9K———$8K$12K
Average discount rate—60%—————60%60%60%30%—44%50%50%47%47%40%40%40%40%40%40%———40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)3333332222——————————————————
Service providers—1—————2214—44444443443———37
Avg download speed (Mbps)——————10,00010,0008,0006,000——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)——————10,00010,0008,0006,000——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice——————————$3K—————————————————
Telecomm Services————————————$7K$9K$9K$9K$12K$11K$11K$12K$11K$7K$9K———$7K$12K
Internal Connections—$76K—————$71K$10K—$8K—————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—————————————$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K———————$400$400
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections—————————$1K——————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Sentinel Technologies, Inc.—$76K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Luther C Klager Elementary School405 Ann Arbor St 48158Manchester60%1705432%——Rural
Manchester Junior Senior High School20500 Dutch Drive 48158Manchester60%2866723%——Rural
Riverside Intermediate School710 E Main St 48158Manchester60%1864926%——Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.