Atlanta School District C 3

Billed Entity 136981 · Missouri

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$6K$12K$12K$12K$8K$1K$960$19K$1K$2K———$6K$6K$7K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K—————
Average discount rate70%70%70%70%70%79%80%75%58%30%60%60%80%38%80%80%80%75%79%79%75%75%70%————67%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers22222211211111111111111————2
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0003001501005,03810,000——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,000300150105,03810,000——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$227$1K$2K—————————————————
Telecomm Services——————————————$6K$6K$7K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K—————
Internal Connections—$5K——————$18K———————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$960$672———————————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services——$10K$10K$10K$7K——————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Quality Network Solutions, Inc—$5K$10K$10K$10K$7K——$18K———————————————————
Chariton Valley Broadband LLC—$2K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Atlanta Elementary School600 S Atteberry 63530Atlanta70%1134338%1,0001,000Rural
Atlanta High School600 S Atteberry 63530Atlanta70%923033%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.