Milan School District C 2

Billed Entity 136994 · Missouri

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$7K$22K$10K$30K$19K$14K$31K—$45K$18K$31K$11K—$11K$6K——————$5K$6K$4K————
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%—60%60%73%80%—80%80%——————76%76%76%————
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers2111112—2221—11——————221————
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,000———10,000—5,25010,0006,6686,668——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,000———10,000—5,25010,0006,6686,668——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$3K$6K$18K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$11K—$11K$6K——————$5K$6K$4K————
Internal Connections—$3K—$12K$1K$1K$24K—$29K———————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$1K—————$3K—————————————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————$14K$12K$13K—————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services$6K$19K$10K$18K$17K$13K$5K—————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Quality Network Solutions, Inc$6K$22K$10K$30K$19K$14K$29K—$43K$12K$13K—————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Milan Bus Barn306 N. Pearl St 63556Milan80%———100100—
Milan Elementary School373 S Market St 63556Milan80%35726173%1,0001,000Rural
Milan High School373 S Market St 63556Milan80%29120570%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.