Sherwood School District R 8

Billed Entity 137265 · Missouri

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$16K$6K——$8K——$2K$3K$61K$9K$7K$5K$5K$5K$4K$5K$4K—$1K$4K$1K—————
Average discount rate—70%70%70%70%70%——20%40%68%73%74%74%74%69%55%69%60%62%74%67%57%—————
Schools & libraries (in this area)—333333333——————————————————
Service providers—11111——335432223332423—————
Avg download speed (Mbps)————10,000—10,00010,00010,00010,000——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)————10,000—10,00010,00010,00010,000——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$2K$3K——————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$7K$7K$5K$5K$5K$4K$5K$4K—$1K$4K$1K—————
Internal Connections—$16K$6K——$8K————$61K—————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access———————————$2K————————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
CDW Government LLC—$16K$6K——$8K——————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Sherwood Elementary School33300 S Sherwood Dr 64739Creighton70%35314240%——Rural
Sherwood High School33300 S Sherwood Dr 64739Creighton70%2487329%10,00010,000Rural
Sherwood Middle School33300 S Sherwood Drive 64739Creighton70%1696538%——Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.