Keytesville School District R3

Billed Entity 137354 · Missouri

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$10K$8K—————————$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K————$648$2K$2K$2K$2K—
Average discount rate70%60%———————80%60%80%80%80%75%75%75%74%70%70%75%70%70%65%65%60%70%—
Schools & libraries (in this area)22——222222——————————————————
Service providers22———————311111111111222233—
Avg download speed (Mbps)500500——10,000—10,00010,00010,00010,000——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)500500——10,000—10,00010,00010,00010,000——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————————————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K————$648$2K$2K$2K$2K—
Internal Connections$10K$2K——————————————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$756——————————————————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services—$5K——————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Quality Network Solutions, Inc$10K$8K——————————————————————————
Chariton Valley Communications Corporation—$756——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Keytesville Elementary School27247 Hiwy 5 65261Keytesville70%632844%500500Rural
Keytesville High School27247 Hwy 5 65261Keytesville70%461533%500500Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.