Cornerstones Of Care

Billed Entity 16028589 · Missouri

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$22K——$3K$3K$13K$11K$10K$13K$15K$10K$24K$48K$30K$29K$14K$32K$4K—$26K———————
Average discount rate80%85%90%90%90%90%90%63%70%77%83%90%90%90%65%90%60%90%90%90%90%———————
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers112111222112223444345———————
Avg download speed (Mbps)2502501007575100100100100100——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2502501007575100100100100100——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice———————$241$905$3K$4K—————————————————
Telecomm Services——————————$11K$3K$5K$10K$5K$29K$9K$21K$4K—$26K———————
Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$22K——$3K$3K$13K$11K$9K$11K—$7K$19K$38K$25K—$5K$11K——————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Easton Telecom Services, LLC—$22K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Cornerstones Of Care Education Campus9001 James A. Reed 64138Kansas City80%1135750%500500Urban
Gillis Center8150 Wornall Road 64114Kansas City80%00—500500Urban
Ozanam Home421 East 137th Street 64145Kansas City80%00—500500Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.