Eastampton Twp School District

Billed Entity 123238 · New Jersey

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$4K$6K$7K$7K$12K$20K$16K$7K—$1K$10K$9K$8K$9K$8K$8K$10K$9K$8K—$9K$8K$10K————
Average discount rate50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%—37%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%—40%40%40%————
Schools & libraries (in this area)222221111———————————————————
Service providers131113432—3333333333—546————
Avg download speed (Mbps)50050050050050050010010075———————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)500500500500500500202015———————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice——————————$1K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$9K$8K$7K$7K$8K$8K$10K$9K$8K—$6K$6K$7K————
Internal Connections—————$9K$19K$14K$5K———————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$4K$5K$7K$7K$3K$1K$1K$1K——$1K$1K$1K$2K——————$2K$2K$2K————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services—$409$546$546$510$510$510$510$510———————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Verizon Business Global LLC$3K$4K——————————————————————————
XTel Communications, Inc.—$409$6K$7K$7K$2K$510$510$6K——$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$7K$6K$6K—$4K——————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Administration Office1 Student Drive 08060Eastampton Twp50%———500500—
Eastampton Community School1 Student Dr 08060Eastampton50%60917729%500500Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.