Yeshivat Keter Torah

Billed Entity 15489901 · New Jersey

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$192K$122K———————$5K$12K$13K$13K$206K$25K$21K$18K$16K—$8K$5K——————
Average discount rate85%80%70%50%———80%50%56%73%90%90%90%90%83%73%80%80%80%80%80%——————
Schools & libraries (in this area)2121————————————————————————
Service providers1213———233566654643424——————
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,0002,000———156156156——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,0002,000———156156156——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————————————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$10K$12K$12K$13K$11K$21K$18K$15K—$8K$5K——————
Internal Connections—$19K————————————$175K—————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$173K$122K————————$2K$1K$617————$336—————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections——————————————$18K$14K————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services——————————$5K—————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Top Quality Communication Inc—$173K——————————————————————————
ITCON Inc.—$19K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Yeshivat Keter Torah5 Meridian Rd 07724Eatontown80%34521462%2,0002,000Urban
Yeshivat Keter Torah Administrative Offices 296 Jersey Ave.5 Meridian Rd 07724Eatontown80%———2,0002,000—

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.