Congregation Yeshiva Beis Chaya Mushka Inc.

Billed Entity 16027387 · New York — New York City & Long Island

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$46K$42K$90K$85K$59K$78K$39K$3K$3K———$68K$831K$54K$25K$148K$16K—$399K———————
Average discount rate87%88%90%90%88%90%90%57%65%63%85%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%—90%———————
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111——————————————————
Service providers1212332663535565553—5———————
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0002,0002,0002,0002,0001,00030025010051——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0002,0002,0002,0002,0001,00030025010051——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice———————$274$1K$2K——————————————————
Telecomm Services—————————————$59K$177K$37K$24K$5K$16K—$14K———————
Internal Connections——————————————$629K——$127K——$384K———————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$46K$42K$90K$85K$59K$78K—$1K$971———$9K$2K$1K$2K$809——$1K———————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections——————————————$23K$16K—$15K——————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services———————$39K————————————————————
Unspecified————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Top Quality Communication Inc—$46K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Congregation Yeshiva Beis Chaya Mushka Inc.1505 Carroll Street 11213Brooklyn85%30029097%1,0001,000Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.