Bais Yaakov D'Chassidei Gur

Billed Entity 198368 · New York — New York City & Long Island

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$102K$31K—————————$21K$24K$16K$42K$40K$40K$97K$46K$33K$10K—$45K—$11K$11K——
Average discount rate89%90%—————70%55%66%81%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%—
Schools & libraries (in this area)11—————1————————————————————
Service providers26—————3779101312121189776176996—
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0002,000—————2033——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0002,000—————2033——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————————————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$20K$24K$15K$15K$15K$14K$13K$12K$12K$9K—$11K—$11K$11K——
Internal Connections$79K————————————————$62K$16K———$34K—————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$23K$31K—————————$1K$747$820$957$820$934$820$820$820$820—$706—————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections——————————————$26K$24K$24K$22K$17K$21K————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————
Wireless School Bus Services and Equipment————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
MC Networking Group Inc.$102K$31K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Bais Yaakov D'Chassidei Gur1975 51 St. 11204Brooklyn90%618618100%2,0002,000Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.