Monroe School District 1j

Billed Entity 145019 · Oregon

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$19K$9K$6K$27K$5K$8K$12K—————$4K$5K$5K$5K$5K—$4K$5K$5K—$5K$7K$7K$7K$7K$7K
Average discount rate90%70%70%70%70%70%70%———60%80%77%77%77%77%77%77%70%77%80%73%74%74%73%73%70%70%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers1212121———111111111211332542
Avg download speed (Mbps)5,0004,83350050050050010,0006,0006,0006,000——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)5,0004,83350050050050010,0006,0006,0006,000——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————————————————————————
Telecomm Services————————————$4K$5K$5K$5K$5K—$4K$5K$5K—$5K$7K$7K$7K$7K$7K
Internal Connections—$4K—$21K—$4K$12K—————————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$19K$6K$6K$5K$5K$4K——————————————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Casco Communications, Inc$19K$6K$6K$5K$5K———————————————————————
Linn Benton Lincoln ESD—$4K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Monroe Grade School600 Dragon Dr 97456Monroe85%25018976%——Rural
Monroe Junior-Senior High School365 N 5th St 97456Monroe85%1199076%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.