Rogue River School District # 35

Billed Entity 145059 · Oregon

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$9K$119K$10K$17K$22K$20K$29K$25K$44K$38K$33K$35K$34K$44K$46K$44K$46K$40K$26K$37K$20K$7K$18K$14K$13K$13K
Average discount rate90%84%75%60%80%80%80%80%80%53%80%80%80%80%73%73%70%72%70%75%75%71%71%69%62%63%64%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers121111112266566555533223232
Avg download speed (Mbps)5,5005,5005,5005,5005,5005,5005,6225,5005,5005,050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)5,5005,5005,5005,5005,5005,5005,6225,5005,5005,050

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$34K$32K$32K$32K$40K$46K$28K$29K$19K$17K$33K$20K$7K$18K$14K$8K$3K
Internal Connections$107K$19K$7K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$9K$11K$10K$17K$22K$20K$29K$25K$25K$4K$768$3K$2K$4K$16K$16K$21K$9K$3K$6K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
InterVision Systems llc$107K
Hunter Communications, Inc.$9K$11K$10K$17K$22K$20K$29K$25K$25K$21K$19K$19K$18K$17K$17K$16K$16K$16K$17K

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Rogue River Elementary300-301 Pine Street 97537Rogue River85%40938193%10,00010,000Urban
Rogue River Junior/Senior High School1898 E Evans Creek Rd 97537Rogue River85%31420666%10,00010,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.