Bishop Thomas K. Gorman Catholic

Billed Entity 86803 · Texas — North

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$5K$9K$6K$19K$10K$8K$6K$6K$5K$3K$6K$9K$8K$9K$6K—————————————
Average discount rate50%50%40%40%40%40%45%40%40%40%30%40%40%40%40%—————————————
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111——————————————————
Service providers121211111214444—————————————
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,5001,5001,5001,5002,0001,0002001007550——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,5001,5001,5001,5002,0001,0002001007550——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice——————————$1K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$4K$3K$3K$4K—————————————
Internal Connections—$2K—$13K————————————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$5K$7K$6K$6K$10K$8K$6K$6K$5K$3K$5K$5K$5K$5K$2K—————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cebridge Telecom TX, LP$5K$7K$6K$6K$10K$8K$6K$6K$5K$3K$6K$5K$5K$5K$2K—————————————
Tyler Communications Systems Inc.—$2K—$13K————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Bishop Thomas K. Gorman Catholic1405 E Southeast Loop 323 75701Tyler50%2104421%1,5001,500Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.