Cashmere School District 222

Billed Entity 145385 · Washington

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$34K$36K$15K$37K——$89K$53K—$24K$40K$10K$9K$17K—$12K$13K—————$9K————
Average discount rate60%60%70%70%70%70%70%70%80%67%63%77%77%79%77%74%74%76%77%77%67%70%67%67%————
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers111111121223241112221111————
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,2441,2441,2441,244156156270270500500——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,2441,2441,2441,244156156270270500500——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice——————————$24K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$40K$10K$9K$17K—$12K$13K—————$9K————
Internal Connections—$3K$4K—$37K——$89K$39K———————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$12K$10K—————————————————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————$14K———————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services—$19K$22K$15K————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Educational Service District 171—$34K$36K$15K$37K——$58K$53K———————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Cashmere Middle School300 Tigner Rd 98815Cashmere80%49624750%1,2441,244Urban
Vale Elementary School101 Pioneer Ave 98815Cashmere80%63833653%1,2441,244Urban

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.