Butternut School District

Billed Entity 133262 · Wisconsin

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$1K$3K$5K$5K$11K$3K$5K$5K$34K———————————$4K$8K$4K$8K———
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%70%80%80%50%79%———————————70%70%60%60%———
Schools & libraries (in this area)3333333333——————————————————
Service providers1121121247———————————4334———
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0003253251,000100——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0003253251,000100——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$725$2K——————————————————
Telecomm Services——————————————————————$3K$645$3K———
Internal Connections—————$4K———$26K——————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$1K$1K$5K$5K$7K$3K$5K$5K$5K———————————$4K$5K$3K$5K———
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections——$1K—————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services—————————$2K——————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Norvado, Inc.—$1K$1K—————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Butternut Charter School312 W Wisconsin St 54514Butternut80%00—1,0001,000Rural
Butternut Elementary School312 W Wisconsin St 54514Butternut80%844351%1,0001,000Rural
Butternut High School312 W Wisconsin Street 54514Butternut80%924852%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.