Seneca Area School District

Billed Entity 133333 · Wisconsin

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$4K$6K$5K$6K$87K$27K$19K—$23K—$10K$12K$11K$14K$12K—$4K$5K$6K$2K$2K———————
Average discount rate80%80%75%80%80%80%80%80%60%63%72%80%80%80%77%—75%76%74%70%65%——————60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)3333333333——————————————————
Service providers112232223334443—21121——————5
Avg download speed (Mbps)5005008755001,0003003001,00026976——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)5005008755001,0001,0001,0001,00032544——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$638—$2K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$2K$3K$3K$3K—$3K$3K$4K—————————
Internal Connections————$40K———$12K—$3K—————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$6K$5K$5K$27K$19K$19K—$5K—$5K$9K$9K$11K$9K—$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K———————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services———$518$19K$8K——$5K———————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
WiscNet$4K$6K$5K—————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Seneca Elementary School202 Main Street 54654Seneca80%1096560%500500Rural
Seneca High School202 Main St 54654Seneca80%913842%500500Rural
Seneca Junior High School202 Main Street 54654Seneca80%533158%500500Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.