Council School District 13

Billed Entity 142701 · Idaho

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$27K$18K$14K$14K$14K$28K$17K$18K$22K$37K—————————————————
Average discount rate70%75%80%80%80%80%80%80%65%70%75%—————————————————
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers23211132222—————————————————
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0005005005002501005050——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0005005005002501005050——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$3K$5K$11K—————————————————
Telecomm Services————————————————————————————
Internal Connections—$9K$2K———$15K$4K$1K$790$10K—————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$14K$16K$14K$14K$14K$13K$13K$14K$16K$16K—————————————————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections——————————$302—————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services—$4K——————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cambridge Telephone Company, Inc.—$14K——————————————————————————
Council Computers—$14K——————————————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Council Elementary School202 S Michigan St 83612Council70%1326045%1,0001,000Rural
Council Jr-Sr High School101 E Bleeker Ave 83612Council70%1125146%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.