Garden Valley School Dist 71

Billed Entity 142707 · Idaho

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$11K$2K$7K$7K$25K$39K$17K$16K$17K$11K$16K$15K$16K$14K$16K$15K$12K$11K$12K$11K—$9K—$240$5K$3K—
Average discount rate75%70%70%70%70%70%70%80%46%50%60%70%70%77%77%77%70%70%70%48%70%60%60%—51%51%58%—
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers32234543484444454223222—332—
Avg download speed (Mbps)5501,0001,000105105101105105105156——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)5501,0001,000101101105101101101156——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$588$2K$3K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$7K$6K$7K$5K$6K$5K$5K$4K$5K$4K—$3K—$63$2K$3K—
Internal Connections—————$8K$25K—————————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$11K$2K$7K$7K$17K$14K$17K$15K$15K$8K$10K$9K$10K$10K$10K$10K$7K$7K$7K$7K—$6K—$177$3K——
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
CITIZENS TELECOMM CO OF IDAHO—$9K$755——————$1K$9K$13K$13K$13K$12K$5K$5K$5K$4K$5K$4K—$3K——$2K$2K—
CTC Telecom, Inc.—$2K$2K$4K$5K$4K———$72$700$834—$1K$1K—————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Garden Valley Jr-Sr High Sch1053 Banks Lowman Rd 83622Garden Valley80%24414861%1,0001,000Rural
Lowman Elementary School3489 Banks Lowman Road 83637Lowman80%00—100100Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.