Melba Joint School Dist 136

Billed Entity 142725 · Idaho

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$61K$16K$33K$27K$66K$14K$17K$96K$27K$34K$28K$9K$9K$8K$9K$8K$9K$11K$9K$14K$14K———————
Average discount rate73%70%70%70%70%70%70%80%56%60%67%80%80%79%78%73%56%57%57%60%60%—————67%—
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222——————————————————
Service providers213332224334454433211—————1—
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,000600600600450450350350—150——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,000600600600450450350350—150——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$2K$4K$5K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$9K$7K$6K$6K$5K$3K$5K$4K$3K$3K———————
Internal Connections$5K—$16K$10K$50K——$77K$8K$16K——————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$56K$16K$16K$16K$14K$14K$17K$19K$18K$14K$23K$615$1K$2K$2K$2K$6K$6K$6K$11K$11K———————
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————$2K———————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Fatbeam, LLC$56K$16K$16K$16K$14K$14K$17K$96K$26K$32K——————————————————

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Melba Elementary School521 Carrie Rex 83641Melba70%39916140%1,0001,000Rural
Melba Jr. Sr. High School6870 Stokes Lane 83641Melba70%42312630%1,0001,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.