Riley County Unif Sch Dist 378

Billed Entity 137666 · Kansas

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$1K$29K$18K$18K$70K$14K$33K$16K$16K$22K$25K$41K$40K$32K$37K$38K$20K$18K$21K$13K$23K$25K$31K$29K$13K
Average discount rate60%60%60%60%60%60%50%60%60%33%50%67%67%67%67%67%60%60%54%60%60%60%60%60%56%
Schools & libraries (in this area)3333333333
Service providers2211212112233444445765776
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,00010,00010,00010,00010,0001,0001,000200200200
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,00010,00010,00010,00010,0001,0001,000200200200

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$6K$25K
Telecomm Services$38K$37K$28K$33K$33K$17K$18K$17K$9K$19K$21K$27K$26K$13K
Internal Connections$1K$8K$51K$20K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$20K$18K$18K$18K$14K$11K$16K$16K$16K$3K$3K$4K$4K$5K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$3K$4K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$1K$944$1K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Twin Valley Telephone, Inc.$20K$18K$18K$18K$14K$11K$16K$16K$20K$23K$31K$31K$28K$31K$31K$11K$10K$10K$2K$3K

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
District Office204 W. Kansas Ave. 66531Riley60%2,0002,000
Riley County Grade School117 N Remmele St 66531Riley60%50812525%2,0002,000Rural
Riley County High School12451 Fairview Church Road 66531Riley60%2274721%2,0002,000Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.