Menno School District 33-2

Billed Entity 134087 · South Dakota

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies—$61K—$1K$7K$1K$4K$3K$2K$3K$3K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K$4K$2K$4K$4K—$1K$1K—$1K$2K
Average discount rate—70%—80%80%80%80%80%56%62%65%75%78%76%78%72%69%71%71%75%75%71%—55%60%65%60%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)—222222222——————————————————
Service providers—2—1212234432222233333—23132
Avg download speed (Mbps)—250—50383838383812——————————————————
Avg upload speed (Mbps)—250—50444443——————————————————

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice————————$1K$2K$2K—————————————————
Telecomm Services———————————$3K$3K$3K$4K$4K$3K$3K$4K$2K$4K$4K—$1K$1K—$1K$2K
Internal Connections—$60K——$5K—$3K$2K—$331$718—————————————————
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access—$1K—$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K——$648$648$576———————————$360$648
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections————————————————————————————
Managed Internal Broadband Services————————————————————————————

Subsidies by service provider (top 10, FY2024)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Riverside Technologies, Inc.—$60K————————$718—————————————————
Golden West Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc.—$1K—$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$2K$2K$3K$4K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K—$1K$1K—$1K$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientAddressCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPNSLP %Down MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Jamesville Colony Elem School43582 Ne Jim River Rd 57067Utica70%2000%250250Rural
Maxwell Colony Elem School42805 Maxwell Rd 57059Scotland70%4343100%250250Rural

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Service-provider top 10 ranked by FY2024 disbursements. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.